Teague says health-care bill still needs work
Posted 8/20/2009 11:00:00 AM

At Las Cruces town hall, congressman expresses concern about bill’s vague wording, pledges to participate in any plan that’s approved
Harvey Baldwin asked nearly every person who walked into U.S. Rep. Harry Teague’s town hall meeting in Las Cruces on Thursday whether he could give them a pocket copy of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.
“I want to educate the people about what our country is founded on and what our politicians are doing against us,” he said. “They’re destroying our country with this debt they’re creating.”
Many accepted the booklets Baldwin was handing out on behalf of the group Las Cruces TEA (Taxed Enough Already!) Party. Some engaged him in civil discussion of health care and other issues.
The town hall itself was similarly civil, and proved to be a good opportunity for constituents of the Democrat, who represents the 2nd Congressional District, to learn where Teague stands on the health-care reform proposal being debated by Congress.
“I have some concerns about it myself,” Teague said about the bill. “… I’m not trying to sell you the bill and I’m not trying to kill the bill. I’m trying to learn from you about your concerns.”
Those in attendance at the meeting at the county’s government center were engaged. Applause was frequent and loud. While there was a bit of rowdiness, it didn’t get out of hand.
Teague did a lot of listening as dozens of people -- some opposed to the reform bill Democrats are proposing and some in favor of it -- shared their opinions. Proponents talked about the need for reforms to fix a broken system. Opponents’ concerns included unrestrained spending, losing control over their own health care and the lack of discussion of tort reform.
‘I don’t think there should be any sacred cows’
Teague was specifically asked if he would pledge to fight to have reform that limits liability lawsuits against doctors included in any bill that is approved. Teague said he told House leaders he wants them to consider tort reform, but he won’t promise to support that or any other provision at this point.
“I think that health care is the most important thing to face our country. I don’t think there should be any sacred cows, and that should include tort reform,” he said.
Teague was asked if a reform bill should require members of Congress and government workers to participate in any government-run system that is created.
“Any program that I vote for, that’s where I’ll get my insurance,” he pledged.
The congressman also expressed concern about provisions in the bill he said are vague. He said such poor wording makes intentions behind some provisions unclear and opens the door for fear and misinformation to spread.
Because of that, Teague said he was among a group of House members who asked leadership in July to delay a vote on the proposal until after the current August recess ends.
One of the provisions that is vague, Teague said, has led some to believe Congress intends to ration health care in America and force everyone to participate in a government plan.
“I do want everyone to have a personal choice,” he said. “We’re not trying to ration anything, but, again, there’s some vagueness in the bill. … That’s one of the places where we’re going to have to clear things up.”
‘Proud to be an American’
Several people who spoke complained to Teague about government programs that have been recently approved or are being discussed -- including bailouts, cap-and-trade legislation and health-care reform. Following most questions, Teague told people he thought their concerns were valid.
One woman who raised concerns, Geneva Mitchell of Las Cruces, thanked Teague for hearing the concerns of her and others.
“I appreciate you having this meeting,” she said. “I think it’s great that we can stand up and tell you how we feel.”
At the conclusion of the meeting, Teague thanked those in attendance for their civility.
“It’s meetings like this that make me proud to be an American,” he said.

Labels: Health-care reform, Las Cruces, Washington



















7 Comments:
In the end all that will happen is that New Mexico's 2nd Congessional District will have the same vote as California's 8th.
Or NM 3rd CD. But the bottom line about this really is, is Harry listening or is he actually hearing and understanding the problems people have with HR 3200. If he votes for a bill that grandfathers private policies for 5 years and then outlaws them because of bureaucratic regulations that disqualifies them (as HR 3200 does, and that is NOT vague), and thus 90% of existing private policies (which have caps today, according to Obama) become void, he will be destroying the vast majority of private choices. Does he favor that?
He will also be increasing the costs of any private insurance premiums, as you can't in effect drastically raise the risk profiles of the insured pool (no caps, must accept all with no pre-conditions) without increasing costs drastically. That is not how insurance works, Harry should at least know that.
Also, there are no enforcement (citizenship verifications and checks) provisions in HR 3200 to ensure illegals don't get coverage, or to ensure taxpayer monies aren't used for abortions. Add to that no way to pay for the massive increases or even a good estimate of same, and you have a pig in a poke where the government says "trust us" when they should know most citizens do not. After the debacles of the carbon tax bill, the porkulus spending with no results, and the bailouts of irresponsible people and corporations (as well as 8 years of Bush lies followed by 6 months of Obama lies), Harry should know how distrustful many Americans are of government.
Sorry, Heath, but this post is an example of the problem with the media's "failure to commit journalism" in the coverage of the health care reform debate (and I say this with all good will as you are one of the "good guys" in reporting). Is it any wonder half the people in this country are severely uninformed about major public issues when the press is so influence with selling their story vs. telling the facts?
Of all the audience members who attended and either gave reasoned opinions or asked rational questions, who is the one who got his picture posted on your website?
The one who gets the most "rubber neckers" to your story, but doesn't represent the totality of content of the meeting: "Extremist Anti-Tax Dude" waving a copy of the Constitution as if no one else there had any idea of what it means, and worse yet as if he's a good summary of opinion there. God bless him, he's exercising his 1st Amendment rights, but how many folks in this district really believe in no taxation for ANYTHING? 1% maybe?
Yes you mentioned some of the others in attendance, but we all know that the headline--and often more importantly, the picture--imparts the theme and tone for a news story.
My take on the current debate is that far too many people have no idea what this health care legislation contains, whether they are for reform or against it, not even counting the totally made up disinformation being spread by rumor about it. Because of that, fear mongering is taking the place of journalism. From your written account and that I've read elsewhere, most audience members here were happy with Mr. Teague's performance at the meeting. They had substantive questions, asked for information, and the back and forth was cordial and respectful, not extremist in the least, thank Heaven. How can we return that tone to the reporting?
I also attended this town hall meeting at the Dona Ana County Courthouse. While passions and emotions were high, Las Crucens can be proud that they conducted themselves with decorum and respect for one another. It was a good forum.
I also have to complement Rep. Teague on a well run meeting and the respectful give and take with his constituents from all view points.
I think Teague has greater understanding of the issue than most members of congress having been an employer with the morality to provide care for his people. He understands how it is getting more and more impossible to pay the premiums and he knows that co-pays and deductibles make it difficult for his people to take proper care of themselves.
I trust him on this one.
Although my comment may be a bit off-topic, I am responding to the issue that Thinker brought up in his comment above. His observation is very very important: the picture included in this article (TEA man) is not representative of the tone of the meeting and thus distorts the impression one gets from reading the article. Thinker also suggests that this is sensationalist reporting intended to increase readership rather than to inform. So, HEATH, I would really like to read your response to what Thinker has said. I agree that the press has let the American people down and has to assume a high percent of the responsibility for not informing (or mis-informing) the public. Your response, Heath???
I'd be happy to explain. I think the key paragraphs in the entire story are these:
Many accepted the booklets Baldwin was handing out on behalf of the group Las Cruces TEA (Taxed Enough Already!) Party. Some engaged him in civil discussion of health care and other issues.
The town hall itself was similarly civil, and proved to be a good opportunity for constituents of the Democrat, who represents the 2nd Congressional District, to learn where Teague stands on the health-care reform proposal being debated by Congress.
Mr. Baldwin never said he was advocating "no taxation for ANYTHING" -- at least in his conversations with me. And the conversations I observed him have with others, as those two key paragraphs point out, were all civil -- on his part and on the parts of the people he was speaking with.
In my view, those discussions were a good example of how Teague's hall went -- civil and engaging. And that was the tone of the entire story, which ended with Teague praising those in attendance for acting in a way that was conducive to discussion and debate.
So, based on what I observed, I thought the exchanges between Mr. Barney and others were a good example I could use to illustrate at the beginning of the story the point of the entire story -- that this was a time of people of widely varying opinions coming together for respectful discussion and debate that was healthy.
Post a Comment
<< Home
Published comments have been deemed by Heath Haussamen to be in compliance with this site’s comments policy. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Heath Haussamen or this site. If you know of a person who is abusing this site’s comments system by impersonating someone else or in other ways, please report it by clicking here.