Ethics reforms New Mexico needs

Posted 6/14/2009 11:35:00 PM

Here are five proposals I believe would fundamentally change the way business is done in the Land of Enchantment

Manny Aragon. Michael Montoya. Robert Vigil. Roberta Vigil. Eric Serna. Bill Richardson.

Those are the names of scandal-plagued public officials the Albuquerque Journal mentions in a weekend editorial in arguing that New Mexico’s “shoddy record is out of proportion with the state’s progress toward ethics reform.”

“Yes, lawmakers have approved a flawed gift ban, opened conference committees and capped campaign contributions. But as the governor’s private jet trip to Mexico showed, there isn’t much interest by the attorney general and others in doing things like asking for receipts to make sure public officials are paying market value,” the editorial states.

The Journal also points out loopholes in ethics laws and calls for additional reform, including an independent ethics commission and a real-time, searchable campaign reporting Web site.

All good. The number of scandals plaguing government in New Mexico is overwhelming. There’s simply no way to keep track of it all. Most people I know who are paying attention are simply waiting for the next shoe to drop.

I’ve written much on this site about ethics reform, and I’ve come to believe there are at least five critical reforms New Mexico needs:

• Creation of an independent ethics commission: A commission without subpoena power is like a watchdog without teeth. An ethics commission must be bipartisan in its membership and have members appointed by representatives of all three branches of government so it’s independent, but it must also have the ability to investigate, with subpoena power, what it needs to investigate. In addition, it must be tasked with developing a state code of ethics and educating public officials about how to follow that code.

• Beefing up the state auditor’s office: In some states, the auditor is arguably the second-most powerful state official behind the governor. Not so in New Mexico, even though Auditor Hector Balderas has taken some steps to increase his office’s ability to combat fraud. The auditor has broad authority, including subpoena power, but the office is hampered because it is grossly understaffed. White-collar crimes including public corruption are increasingly complex and difficult for the state’s district attorneys and attorney general to tackle. Having enough staffers in the auditor’s office to adequately aid in such investigations and do their own, independent probes when necessary would create a new level of accountability in New Mexico.

Paying legislators: This one is simple: There’s a culture of entitlement in the Legislature. Some, but not all, believe they deserve certain things, including gifts, because they aren’t paid. So pay them. Take away the excuse to blur ethical lines.

• Creation of a comprehensive, online database of money in New Mexico politics: We need a quick, simple, accessible way to find out how money is being spent on campaigning and lobbying. The secretary of state’s office has promised but failed to deliver this for years, through two administrations. For it to truly happen, some disclosure laws need to be updated and adequate funding needs to be appropriated. If that happens and the secretary of state still can’t get such a site built, the Legislature and governor need to take the project out of that office’s hands and find someone who can do it.

• Expanding webcasting: New Mexico took a quantum leap forward this year with the approval of audio webcasting from the House floor and limited video webcasting from the Senate floor. But we can do much better. We should have live audio and video from both chambers and committee meetings, and it should be archived. We should also have the equipment set up to webcast major events held in the rotunda at the Roundhouse, such as news conferences. And what about meetings of other public bodies such as the Public Regulation Commission and the investment boards that have come under so much scrutiny lately? And news conferences held in the governor’s office? Webcasting is cheap and easy. There’s no good reason to not do it.

Transparency, education and real accountability. That would help fundamentally change New Mexico. Will it happen? Not if we rely on lawmakers to get it done, apparently. Perhaps what we really need is a constitutional convention like the one being proposed by Rep. Joseph Cervantes, D-Las Cruces.

I believe New Mexicans want reform. Take reform proposals directly to the voters and I suspect good things will happen.

Labels: , ,

12 Comments:

At 12:22 AM, June 15, 2009, Blogger Sheriff Greg Solano said...

Excellent comments on reform. We really also need to look at the cost to run a political campaign. The media often wants to scrutinize the money raised and where it comes from but they give no discounts and have no problem raking in huge profits during election time.

I am not sure public campaign financing will work and New Mexico's limited experience with it has not had stellar results. The PRC and Albuquerque's mayor races have not shown well for public financing so far.

However I do believe the PRC, State Auditor, Governor, and Attorney General are good places to start public financing with a little tweaking and extra oversight.

I also believe political office is a full time job regardless of the position and should be compensated as such, I believe we will attract some who just want to serve and would not be able to afford to do so. This could also provide honest competition for those who just have ulterior motives and those who want to use politics as a stepping stone to big lobby jobs and other high paying positions. Not to mention the rich who just want more power and to get richer.

Sheriff Greg Solano
Candidate for Lieutenant Governor

 
At 6:29 AM, June 15, 2009, Blogger Dr. J said...

You forgot the most important and effective way to stop the patronage and La Politica system, term limits on ALL offices statewide, and push for one nationwide too. 2 terms for the House, 2 for the Senate, 2 for all other state, county, and local offices. We have to drain the political swamp of powerful, lifetime politicians and return our state and America to the people. By having constant turnover political jobs will be cheaper to get (campaign costs), as it will be much more difficult to become rich as an elected official if you aren't there very long and can not amass power and patronage. We would then get more sincere, qualified people to run for office and no career politicians out for themselves.

 
At 6:51 AM, June 15, 2009, Blogger ched macquigg said...

"We need a quick, simple, accessible way to find out how money is being spent on campaigning and lobbying."

Why just campaigning and lobbying? All state spending should be posted on line.

Why do we need to settle for incremental ethics reform? There is no reason that New Mexico cannot be a model for the free world of transparent accountability. Except of course, to protect some good ol' boys from accountability for their corruption and incompetence.

I would love to see a special session of the legislature devoted to ending the culture of corruption, period; no distractions, no cover for those who want to hide. Nobody leaves until the culture of corruption is dead and buried.

Then we can have another session, to figure out how to spend hundreds of millions of tax dollars.

 
At 8:25 AM, June 15, 2009, Blogger ched macquigg said...

We need legislators like Janice Arnold-Jones. I can't imagine throwing her and others out, because they have been doing such good for too long.

If there was transparent accountability in politics and government, it wouldn't make a bit of difference if all of them were idiots or crooks.

Manny Aragon would not have been able to steal millions of dollars except that the system allowed him to.

If all spending were forensically audited, as matter of course, it would be impossibly difficult to steal money, and the stealing would end.

Transparent accountability is fatal to corruption. The culture of corruption can be ended.

There is no reason that government is not as transparent as the law allows, except that we won't step up and demand it.

Torches and pitchforks are the only tools that have ever deposed tyrants; they are the only tools that ever will.

We will either stand up and demand the end of the culture of corruption, or we will continue to suffer under it.

It is nobody's choice but our own.

What could you possibly have to do on some Saturday morning between now and the next special session, that is more important than spending it standing on the steps of the roundhouse demanding the end of the culture of corruption?

 
At 8:39 AM, June 15, 2009, Blogger Joseph Cummins said...

Heath:

Your ideas are based upon common sense, but, unfortunately common sense does not exist in politics.

We like to think or claim to believe in reliable & honest representative govt, but what have we gotten after a couple hundred years? The practical alternative to the descending darkness of politics is to -- 1) all elected representatives to serve one or two terms max and never again be a public servant or a lobbyist. 2) all unelected public servants with the exception of fire and maybe some police be terminated from their respective agencies every 4 years.

If people do not really want to be public SERVANTS then why do we need them, unless we want more of the same.

 
At 9:20 AM, June 15, 2009, Blogger wedum59 said...

(2) Dr J wants term limits-- Oregon, one of our more progressive states, tried that and abandoned it. It gave the governor (who is paid) too much power. Maybe 6 terms for representatives, three for senators, would work.

(2) I proposed that the legislators be paid the equivalent of one year at minimum wage, but no one got excited about that, so I guess they get more perks with the per diem. If they are paid, they should not get per diem and all that, too much paperwork.

(3) I think we DO need a public financing option. And I think the legislators should start with themselves. Yes, Jerome Block abused the system, BUT he got caught.

 
At 9:25 AM, June 15, 2009, Blogger J. Ramirez said...

Number six: Dump corrupt democrats from office. We need a political change badly. Our system is so broken, its a miracle it still functions.

Term limits. Even better. But unfortunately it will never happen.

 
At 4:12 PM, June 15, 2009, Blogger Tyler said...

I would say that we also need more harsh punishments for those that do violate ethics. A public tongue lashing, although embarrassing, is not enough. I think maybe a public beating would do...

JRamirez, I agree that the majority needs to change, but only disarmed. Ideally, we'd have a faction of Ds & Rs split away, trying to whittle away at the power of the majority. As it stands, we are a blue senate, house, exec & judiciary.

 
At 9:17 PM, June 15, 2009, Blogger EddieF said...

I couldn't agree with Heath more on the independent commission. He forgot to mention Pat Lyons and his list of rogues and Lyon's use of taxpayer dollars to rent an airplane for a bogus trip, use of an SLO attorney to defend him on traffic violations, etc. I believe an accountable expense account would be preferrable over pay for legislators. I believe our elected officials in Dona Ana and some neighboring counties are relatively honest and well meaning, the bad one's have been voted out. Maybe it's because they are far removed from the capital and the "action." Let's press on ethics reform on all fronts, violations have no political party.

 
At 8:39 AM, June 16, 2009, Blogger wedum59 said...

One other point about paying a salary to legislators--they must NOT be allowed to vote themselves pay raises. I remember a story about New Jersey state legislators, who already get $90,000 or so a year, trying to vote themselves a pay raise in the middle of the night--fortunately they got caught (that time).

That's why I proposed that they get paid the same as the annual NM minimum wage. They would only get an increase when all New Mexicans got one.

 
At 9:25 AM, June 16, 2009, Blogger ched macquigg said...

Why insult them with minimum wage?

Why not pay them a fair salary?

What exactly is our goal? If it is to attract capable and honest legislators, why not pay them what a capable legislator is worth?

Passing pay raises in the middle of the night happens as a direct result of the lack of transparent accountability. Why insult a few legislators who might be working very hard in support of it;
Rep. Janice Arnold-Jones for example.

 
At 11:42 AM, June 17, 2009, Blogger Dr. J said...

Mr. macquigg said: "Why insult them with minimum wage?

Why not pay them a fair salary?"

Well, they are our servants right? They are not our masters, though they act like they are and that insults me since I pay their salary. When they start acting like public servants pay them as such, until then even minimum wage is too generous for these egomaniacal power mongers.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Published comments have been deemed by Heath Haussamen to be in compliance with this site’s comments policy. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Heath Haussamen or this site. If you know of a person who is abusing this site’s comments system by impersonating someone else or in other ways, please report it by clicking here.