2nd District hopefuls spar during final debate
Posted 10/29/2008 07:30:00 AM
Republican 2nd Congressional District candidate Ed Tinsley wants voters to believe only he has the ability to clearly articulate vision and argue policy on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives. His Democratic opponent, Harry Teague, wants voters to believe he’s just like them and, because of that, is the only candidate who can bring an outsider’s perspective to
The candidates’ respective views of the race collided Tuesday in their final showdown before Election Day. The debate in
For Teague, there’s been quite a shift from the primary, when he tried to divert attention from the reality that he’s not the most articulate candidate to ever run for Congress. At Tuesday’s forum, he embraced the fact that he never finished high school or attended college because, at age 17, his parents fell ill and he had to begin working in the oilfields in eastern
“I’m not really a trained politician, and I’m not an extravagant orator,” Teague said in portraying himself as a regular citizen running against a lobbyist and lawyer who can’t understand that
“Our Congress doesn’t need another smooth talker or speech giver,” Teague said.
Tinsley, seeking to capitalize on his own ability to articulate his views, cited endorsements he’s won from the Las Cruces Sun-News and Roswell Daily Record. He highlighted the Sun-News’ assertion that Teague “has not articulated a clear vision for our district or for how he would address the pressing issues facing our nation.”
Tinsley, the newspaper said, “better understands Congress and is better prepared for the steep learning curve ahead.”
“It’s about having a vision for American and our district going forward,” Tinsley said at Tuesday’s forum. He later added that the district needs “a congressman who can understand some of the core issues that we face… somebody that can articulate that position in front of 434 members of Congress.”
Though there were enthusiastic supporters of both candidates among the group of about 60 people in attendance at the debate, southern
That was most apparent when the candidates directly engaged each other in a discussion about their own educations.
“You’ve talked down to me about my education this entire election. … That’s hurtful,” Tinsley said, apparently referring to Teague’s attack on the fact that he is a trained lawyer.
Teague countered by pointing out “the time that you tried to tell the people that I wouldn’t be able to talk to the other members of Congress.” That’s when Teague spoke about the fact that he never finished high school or attended college because he had to work. A man in the audience interrupted to shout, “You’re one of us!”
The loud cheering and applause of most in attendance filled the fire station.
Tinsley ended the debate by praising Teague, saying he respects “all he’s done in building his companies and taking care of his employees,” but telling those in attendance that the race is about “who can best represent you in an effective manner.”
“I’m on your team,” Tinsley said.
Teague closed the debate by thanking Tinsley for participating.
“This is what we need. We need a spirited debate about what’s going on,” Teague said. “… Our country is in trouble and our system is broken, and we need somebody who understands that.”
Labels: 2008 election, 2nd Congressional District race, Washington



















4 Comments:
If local, state and federal representatives continue their regulatory course of destroying industries and the associated decent/honorable jobs that made this country great, then no matter how many smooth talkers and bailouts we are doomed to hard-times.
We have a 700 billion dollar bailout for American financial institutions because of the total failure of deregulation. In Mr. Cummins mind, there is too much business regulation. The monumental experiments in deregulation, as well as the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, proposed by Enron lobbyists, which deregulated derivatives markets have led us down the road of disaster.
The Act opened the door for the $596 trillion world-wide derivatives market and paved the way for the financial institutions to become aggressive about investing in sub-prime mortgages. This has led directly to our present crisis. Our financial system was vulnerable because of the intricate financial contracts known as credit derivatives, which insured debt holders against default. They are fashioned privately without any interference by regulators. These poorly designed inventions magnified the impact of bad mortgages and the rating of the rating agencies.
There has been a repeal of the worst features of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 in June despite an outrageous President Bush veto. However, we need more regulation to end the corporate abuses
There are two schools, each as different as night is to day.
One teaches that god is govt and politicians, corporate managers & planners are high priests who promote debt as salvation.
The other side of the ledger is hard work, setting aside earned saving's and avoiding the servitude/poverty trap of hand-outs.
We are reaping what has been sown and are in the process of eating the remaining seeds of future prosperity.
Finally, public corporations, which includes all incorporated cities are created by govt and the managers that run these monstrosities show their contempt for people by their actions.
Again Mr. Cummins totally ignores the fact that that it wasn't regulation but deregulation that created this financial crisis.You build your own intellectual prison when you become a rigid idealogue.
Post a Comment
<< Home
Published comments have been deemed by Heath Haussamen to be in compliance with this site’s comments policy. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Heath Haussamen or this site. If you know of a person who is abusing this site’s comments system by impersonating someone else or in other ways, please report it by clicking here.