Obama needs to be reminded that words matter

Posted 9/10/2008 12:55:00 PM

I didn’t originally think Barack Obama did much damage to his campaign when he said at an April fundraiser in San Francisco that many rural Pennsylvanians respond to their economic plight by becoming “bitter” and clinging to guns, religion, hostility toward people who are different from them and anti-immigrant and anti-trade sentiment.

All politicians make careless statements once in awhile, especially when they don’t realize those words will become public. I figured it would blow over.

I now think I was wrong. I believe Obama’s comment was the beginning of an avalanche that currently has the Democratic presidential nominee buried under the momentum Sarah Palin has brought to John McCain’s campaign.

After making such a foolish statement, Obama needed to rebound by showing rural voters he understands and respects them, particularly on the issues of God and guns. Instead, he’s done the opposite.

Ambiguous on guns

I first began to suspect trouble for Obama in June, when the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the right of Americans to have guns in their homes for self-defense by striking down a Washington, D.C. ban on handguns in homes and requirements that other firearms be equipped with trigger locks or disassembled. An Obama staffer had previously told the Chicago Tribune that “Obama believes the D.C. handgun law is constitutional.”

But on the day of the high court’s decision, the campaign backtracked, calling the previous statement “an inartful attempt to explain the senator’s consistent position” -- as if the prior statement was ambiguous. Then Obama gave a new, quite ambiguous answer that didn’t answer the question of whether he supported the court’s decision. When criticism persisted, he shifted gears the next day and said he supported the court’s decision.

Obama didn’t win over any Second Amendment enthusiasts with his waffling and spin.

Flippant on abortion

Then in August, during a televised interview with Pastor Rick Warren at Saddleback Church in California, Obama dodged one of the most important questions to many watching. Asked when a baby gets human rights, Obama said the question is “above my pay grade.”

It was a flippant response, which Obama later figured out. He said this weekend on ABC’s This Week that his answer was “probably” too flip.

“What I intended to say is that, as a Christian, I have a lot of humility about understanding when does the soul enter into… It’s a pretty tough question,” Obama said in the interview. “And so, all I meant to communicate was that I don’t presume to be able to answer these kinds of theological questions.”

Obama’s unwise words vs. Palin’s consistent views

Obama’s actual views on guns and abortion are ones most Americans can respect, even if they disagree: The Second Amendment, he believes, does give individuals the right to own guns for self defense, but governments should be able to regulate that right, within reason. Abortion should almost always be legal, he believes, but Americans should work together to reduce the number of abortions as much as possible.

But, in the words of Obama, words matter. Making flippant comments and spinning shifty positions, especially after he made the most careless comment of his campaign -- the one about rural Pennsylvanians -- created an opening for another candidate to fire up religious and rural voters.

In that regard, McCain’s picking Palin was brilliant. She’s as pro-Second Amendment and pro-life as they come. On two of the issues most important to many rural voters, there couldn’t be a starker contrast between Obama’s unwise comments and Palin’s consistent views. I believe that is the primary reason for the recent shift in the polls in McCain’s favor.

Palin’s views may be overly simplistic and fail to recognize the complexities of living on this planet. Obama’s brilliance is in his ability to get past bumper-sticker politics and effectively capture the grey at the center of nearly every policy debate. Obama had the attention of religious and rural moderates and conservatives early on because of their frustration with the Bush presidency and Obama’s ability to convey the grey.

But, because of poor word choice, Obama has failed to turn that attention into support. He has failed to show those voters that he understands and respects them.

There’s still time. The honeymoon between the American public and Palin will soon end. Obama will have another opportunity to grab enough rural votes to win the election. But he’ll have to show, with his words, that he respects these voters and takes their issues seriously.

Labels: , ,

10 Comments:

At 2:10 PM, September 10, 2008, Blogger Thinker said...

"Obama needs to be reminded that words matter"? What a load of crap. I knew EXACTLY what Obama was saying in all the examples you gave above, Heath, as did pretty much everyone else I know. But what I saw was a pathetic "press corps" pushing the EASY button and reporting on the horse race, not the content, and unfairly holding him to some bizarre standard it would never hold for a white candidate.

I think it's more important that journalists need to be reminded focus on reporting facts, in context, instead of acting like their job is to MC a WWF match.

Why, pray tell is it MORE important for Barack Obama to get every word or phrase he utters perfect, while John McCain and Sarah Palin can outright lie to the American public about anything, and go completely unchallenged by the press?

 
At 2:33 PM, September 10, 2008, Blogger J. Ramirez said...

His words are signs of frustration and counfusion coupled with the lack of experience he has.

He and his camp have been bewildered in the past week as to figure out how to respond to Palin. Her entrance into the race is unprecidented, and even the most seasoned politicos are unsure how to approach it.

Palin is someone that the American people can identify with, and the GOP is now energized beyond belief. With each comment that Obama makes, he slips further and further toward public opinion that has branded him as an "out of touch elitist." This phrase is not something that the McCain camp had invented; many people see Obama as just that; an elitist.

Whether you belive it or not, we will have the next few weeks to figure out who is the best choice to lead America. Obama should choose his words carefully; especially when it comes time to debate.

 
At 3:16 PM, September 10, 2008, Blogger Mike said...

Independent Reporter no more, Heath's views that have been apparent for quite a while have finally been made obvious.

New Mexico no longer has an unbiased news source, it's sad for us independents.

 
At 6:48 PM, September 10, 2008, Blogger Mike said...

thinker hit it right on the nose! Obama isn't the one lying, it's McCain's every other word that come out of his mouth that is a lie and isn't even being focused on in the press.

 
At 12:48 AM, September 11, 2008, Blogger beanie said...

I don't know what you are reading "thinker" and "mike" but it isn't The Huffington Post. Go to today's Post and scroll down. You will find a partial list of media outlets that are calling McCain on his slimy campaign tactics and his lies.

 
At 8:24 AM, September 11, 2008, Blogger Thinker said...

beanie,

You're right about the Huffington Post. The problem is, it's the mainstream media that is doing such a poor job with this election, and it's enabling McPalin to get away with making ridiculously outrageous claims about themselves, as well as make outright falsehoods about Obama. In addition, AM radio is conducting completely unregulated 24 hour fact-free campaigning on behalf of the Republican ticket. Unfortunately, lots of "low information voters"--aka, people who don't take the time to inform themselves about the issues--rely on Am Radio and TV soundbites to tell them how to think. So they have no clue, and are falling for the propaganda and lies.

Just the other day one of my spouse's coworkers said he had finally decided to vote for McCain because Obama would raise his taxes--he makes 70K per year, is married and has four dependents--he probably already pays no income taxes, won't see any increases under Obama's plan and he may even see rebates above and beyond his total refund. Sadly, he drank the Limbaugh/FoxNews/Kool-Aid.

All I can say is, I hope to God the young people get their tails to the voting booths this fall. Their entire future is tilting on the edge of disaster.

 
At 12:09 PM, September 11, 2008, Blogger Rick said...

Wow, these comments are interesting. From previous experience posting comments here, I know that admitting any sort of slant to the right will cause the "independents" that frequent this site to attack with deadly force.

I simply want to say that I am still undecided. I have values that lie to the right and to the left of the Great Partisan Line. I think that this post by Heath was an accurate representation of how some conservatives feel. I guess I don't understand why some of the comment-posters are upset at an article that accurately represents a portion of the voting population.

 
At 2:32 PM, September 11, 2008, Blogger whoisright4me said...

I was just curious to see who you all consider to be the "main media outlets" that aren't reporting on the mccain side?
Thanks

 
At 4:26 PM, September 11, 2008, Blogger barbwire said...

Hmm, my comments are failing to appear. Must be too hot in the kitchen.

 
At 9:11 AM, September 12, 2008, Blogger Ben said...

While there is certainly naunce to what Obama said, but it's a small nuance. While explaining to donors in San Francisco how he will reach certain voters, he said that there are places where the American dream has skipped people over - and that these people therefore become bitter, and therefore it's not surprising that they (being bitter) cling to guns, religion, racism, protectionism and the like.

That's subtly different from saying that all people who like guns or religion do so out of bitterness - Obama is only saying that poor people in smalltown Pennsylvania clinb to guns or religion out of bitterness. That's a really huge "only", though, and that's why Obama is in so much trouble - the vast majority of Americans are a) religious and b) really concerned about their economic situations.

More importantly - and this is the key point - is who Obama said this to, because it made a lot of people feel like Obama says one thing when actually speaking to those poor, religious voters in Scranton, but says something else entirely when speaking to the rich, liberal donors in San Francisco.

And then he did it again when musing to wealthy California donors later on why some voters are having trouble coming around to him, which reaffirmed that suspicion.

I liked McCain because, rather than tell unemployed machinists in Detroit that they'd get their jobs back, he said life was tough and the 21st century needed new job skills - but he'd help government retrain them. I don't like Hillary because she's a big-time environmentalist when talking to greenies and a big-time driver when talking to auto manufacturers. And Obama bothered me when he told a crowd of Jewish voters that Jerusalem would remain the indivisible capital of Israel - something those voters wanted to hear - and had it clarified the next day that he meant physically indivisible, in that no walls would be built in it, but not politically indivisible. That puts Obama in the hilarious position of telling me, a pro-Israel voter, what I want to hear, but actually holding the opposite view of what he said - and the terrifying position of favoring dividing Jerusalem between Jews and Palestinians, but opposing letting Jews defend themselves with a physical barrier. Yikes.

Anyway, that's why words matter, and that's why Obama's apparent condescension to poor rural voters is hurting him.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Published comments have been deemed by Heath Haussamen to be in compliance with this site’s comments policy. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Heath Haussamen or this site. If you know of a person who is abusing this site’s comments system by impersonating someone else or in other ways, please report it by clicking here.