Group hits Sen. Rawson with mailers, radio ad
Posted 7/25/2008 12:27:00 PM
A flier hitting mailboxes this week in the district of Sen. Leonard Lee Rawson, R-Las Cruces, accuses him of engaging in “monkey business” instead of taking reform seriously. A radio ad that will run in the
While debating a bill during the 2007 legislative session that would have made New Mexico the 46th state to enact campaign contribution limits, Rawson, who opposed the bill, proposed an amendment that would have made the proposal take effect in 3007 instead of 2007. The amendment briefly passed, then was removed, before the Senate approved the bill, but a dispute between the House and Senate led to the bill’s demise.
“Senator Rawson acted to block campaign reform for 1,000 years. … Monkey business was substituted for serious legislation,” the mailer from New Mexico Youth Organized states. “… It’s no joke. … Now, with a special legislative session on health care reform coming up, it’s time to get serious.”
The mailer is part of a “Legislative Accountability Campaign” from several Albuquerque-based progressive groups. It comes at a time when progressives have set their sites on defeating the Senate minority whip in November and electing Democrat Steve Fischmann. The left wing of the Democratic Party has had significant success in recent elections in
But Juan Reynosa, who heads the non-profit New Mexico Youth Organized, said the accountability campaign has nothing to do with the election. It’s about the upcoming Aug. 15 session on health-care reform and other issues, he said.
Rawson disagreed. He pointed out that the attorney general’s office said earlier this year that New Mexico Youth Organized’s mailers targeting other legislators weeks before the June primary crossed the line into campaign activity. The AG advised the secretary of state to change the status of New Mexico Youth Organized to force it to comply with standards for political groups instead of those for nonprofits. The group is disputing the AG’s position. A spokesman for the secretary of state’s office said its decision will be announced next week.
The mailer doesn’t refer to the election and instead urges Rawson’s constituents to call him and tell him, as the special session approaches, that “he works for you, not special interests.” Regardless, Rawson’s constituents will receive at least two mailers between now and Aug. 15 attacking him in an election year in which he’s facing a credible challenge. The group’s radio ad will air in the coming days with a similar theme: Its narrator highlights Rawson’s 3007 amendment before stating that “we can’t wait 1,000 years for health-care and ethics reform.”
Other lawmakers also targeted
As evidence that the group’s motives are pure,
Other lawmakers currently being targeted by groups who are part of the accountability campaign are Sens. Diane Snyder, R-Albuquerque, and David Ulibarri, D-Grants, whose constituents are also receiving mailers this week. Like Rawson, Snyder is facing a tough election challenge from a progressive Democrat. Ulibarri is also opposed in November.
The Synder mailer comes from SouthWest Organizing Project, while the Ulibarri mailer comes from the SAGE Council.
The contribution-limits bill
Rawson said there were numerous problems with the contribution-limits bill including the fact that, according to an AG analysis, one provision in it violated an individual’s right against self-incrimination.
And he said it would be easy to skirt limits by giving to political committees or parties and in other ways. Rawson said he, under the $2,300 limit the bill proposed, could have given $105,800 to a candidate by funneling money through his wife, sons and daughters-in-law, granddaughter and 14 companies.
“Quite simply, this is a bad bill,” Rawson said. “It is bad for
A hypocritical group?
Rawson also fired back at New Mexico Youth Organized. He said the mailer “deceitfully” implies that he worked to delay health-care reform for 1,000 years.
The front of the mailer doesn’t mention campaign-finance reform but states that the Legislature will address health-care reform this year and Rawson “wanted to block reform for 1,000 years.” The situation with the contribution-limits bill is discussed on the back of the mailer.
Rawson said that, though the attorney general has said the group must comply with campaign reporting laws “as their actions are clearly to influence an election… they have refused and are defiant.”
“They refuse to reveal from where they obtain their money in accordance with our existing state laws, yet they want campaign-finance reform,” Rawson said. “Perhaps they are more than hypocritical. New Mexico Youth Organized is certainly the very type of group they complain about that buys influence.”
Since the AG originally advised the secretary of state to change his group’s status earlier this year,
James Flores, spokesman for the secretary of state’s office, said a letter has been prepared to send to New Mexico Youth Organized announcing its decision. He would not reveal details, but said the letter will be sent next week after the AG approves it. He said he will discuss it at that point.
Though non-profits aren’t required to reveal the identities of donors,
New Mexico Youth Organized is part of the Center for Civic Policy, an Albuquerque-based progressive group that, according to its Web site, works to “increase voter turnout; educate the public on issues like ethics reform, heath care, the economy and the environment; and train new leaders for civic life.”
A prior version of this posting incorrectly stated that the 2007 contribution-limits bill would have limited contributions from businesses but not unions. The versions of the bill approved by the House and Senate both would have limited contributions from individuals, political committees, parties, businesses and unions.
Labels: 2008 election, ethics reform, Health-care reform, Legislature, nonprofits




















6 Comments:
Hmm... Does anyone else smell "special interests?"
Wait a minute - they couldn't be supporting Fischmann. After all, he is fighting the special intereste, right?
Opposing candidates who are unopposed, now that's bold.
Overall this group and its backers sound very much like the Las Cruces I live in (eyes roll).
If the AG and Sec of State would rule against such groups, we'd have a revolution on our hands as significant numbers of nonprofits and 527s operate here and nationwide in the same manner being criticised here. GOP candidates have some nerve feigning upset over such communications when Rs are infamous for using shady third parties to spread their often grimy spin.
Also, note the concerted and manufactured buzz being created here and at several other local blogs by those who oppose campaign finance and ethics reform and other progressive initiatives. Probably because when people get the facts they vote accordingly and status quo apologists lose.
By the way, there are Republican, Independent and nonpartisan progressives. It's about progress and reform, which used to be a more common goal across party lines. Health care and ethics reform are hardly "left" issues. As numerous polls show, they're mainstream issues these days in America.
I guess "civil rights and the active participation of citizens" are now considered "left" or "left wing" these days. It's evident we're in dire need of more civics classes among the NCLB test-teaching.
Nail on the head, barbwire!
When did activities to “increase voter turnout; educate the public on issues like ethics reform, heath care, the economy and the environment; and train new leaders for civic life.” or to "working to strengthen and expand civil rights and the active participation of citizens in American democracy.” become partisan, special interest? I seem to remember being taught that these actions were my right and responsibility as a US citizen in high school civics class (Pre-NCLB, I might add!!).
Might REAL patriotism have become defined as some sort of "special interest conspiracy" in the wake of overreaching efforts on the part of the Republicans to create a permanent majority nationwide-- by the suppression of these very activities among potential Democratic voters and the gerrymandering of legislative districts to take away the people's rights to participate in our democracy?????
Such activities become partisan or special interest when they twist and distort the truth, or only tell carefully selected parts of the story (usually in an emotional manner) with the intent of discrediting an individual or group that they oppose.
When said "education" becomes deception in this way, the group becomes a special interest rather than an educational organization.
When encouraging "active participation of citizens in American democracy" effectively encourages (explicitly or implicitly) people to vote based on misleading, incomplete, or outright false information, that group becomes partisan.
As you can see by reading the bill and its ammendments (available on the NM Legislature's website, legis.state.nm.us), this bill would actually have imposed restrictions on how much you could donate, but not on these groups. In other words, politicians would have more incentive than ever to sell out to such groups, not less incentive! Is this the kind of ethics / campaign finance reform that you want?
Direct link to the bill, all ammendments to it, and any committee reports available:
http://legis.state.nm.us/lcs/_session.asp?year=07&chamber=S&number=800&type=++&w=com
(You may have to be patient - their website seems to be running slow today.)
I like to give credit where credit is due, so I look at the good Lee Rawson has done for Dona Ana and the love he has for his community.
It is easy to say that a person is for this or that and that he is for special interest groups, but let's be realistic. Fighting for ones county and constituents is a job that is at best a trade off with the other side.
With Lee Rawson I at least know he has the best interests of Dona Ana County and his district at heart. Can one say that of all our state Senators and Representatives? I think not.
I think he has done an exemplary job of working for the district and the county. He has brought millions in funds to us that would have been passed on to other interests had he not fought for his constituents.
Post a Comment
<< Home
Published comments have been deemed by Heath Haussamen to be in compliance with this site’s comments policy. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Heath Haussamen or this site. If you know of a person who is abusing this site’s comments system by impersonating someone else or in other ways, please report it by clicking here.