Tinsley goes negative as race turned upside down
Posted 5/09/2008 05:20:00 PM
Republican 2nd Congressional District candidate Ed Tinsley’s spokeswoman told me in March that Tinsley would continue to run “a positive, issue-based campaign” despite heavy attacks from primary opponent Aubrey Dunn Jr. And yet on Thursday, Tinsley’s campaign issued a news release in response to the National Association of Realtors’ TV ad promoting primary opponent Monty Newman that accused Newman of having a “liberal tax and spend record.” The news release talked about tax and fee increases Newman supported as an elected official in
“Monty’s troubling fiscal record as a career politician in
More hard-hitting is the mailer Republican voters across the district are currently receiving from the Tinsley campaign that attacks Dunn.
“Aubrey Dunn Jr. stands with
You can view the inside of the mailer here and the outside here.
Tinsley told me during an interview in February that he would not go negative. His campaign told me in March that he would not send out negative mailers like the one Dunn sent attacking Tinsley as a “Santa Fe liberal.”
And yet it’s happened.
Tinsley campaign spokesman Christopher Maloney told me today that there has been no shift in strategy. He said Dunn has run a negative, “less-than-honest” campaign from the beginning, and the Tinsley campaign is simply responding by talking about the issues.
But the mailer, in addition to focusing on the Patriot Act, also takes shots at Dunn for giving $2,300 to the presidential campaign of Bill Richardson and for switching party affiliation, stating that those are other times he has “sided with liberal Democrats.”
Maloney also said the Realtors were spreading false information about Newman, so Tinsley’s campaign felt it was important to tell the truth about Newman’s fiscal record. He said the Tinsley campaign won’t resort to personal attacks because “that’s not what wins elections.” He said the campaign plans to contrast the candidates’ stances on the issues until the June 3 primary.
“We’re running an issues-based campaign just as we’ll continue to do. This is not about personal attacks,” Maloney said.
The reality
There’s a fine line between disagreeing on issues and negative attacking. Though the news release about Newman might not have crossed the threshold, the mailer about Dunn certainly did. With all due respect, campaign contributions and party affiliation aren’t policy issues. Neither is whether someone sided with liberal Democrats. Talking about why Dunn’s stance on the Patriot Act is wrong would be an issue-based discussion.
The reality is that Tinsley has gone negative after saying he would not. Why? My guess is that the race hasn’t gone as he planned.
Tinsley’s strategy depended on a big win in
Dunn, meanwhile, had a strategy that didn’t include winning big in
Then the Realtors put almost $600,000 into promoting Newman. Putting that kind of money into effective mailers and TV ads draws support away from all other candidates.
Tinsley was once considered by most to be the frontrunner in a race that’s now completely unpredictable. I’m not sure there is a frontrunner any more. It appears that the Tinsley campaign isn’t sure, either.
Labels: 2008 election, 2nd Congressional District race, Republican Party, Washington



















3 Comments:
"There’s a fine line between disagreeing on issues and negative attacking. Though the news release about Newman might not have crossed the threshold, the mailer about Dunn certainly did. With all due respect, campaign contributions and party affiliation aren’t policy issues. Neither is whether someone sided with liberal Democrats."
Hmmmm... campaign contributions and party affiliation aren't policy issues... but isn't that what your friend McCamley is complaining about with Teague? When McCamley went on Kos and attacked Harry for his contributions, without mentioning how much Harry has given to Dems, why didn't you write about that and how that's not a policy issue?
Tinsley is not well liked even in his own party! He is in trouble and he knows it, Monty may just pull this out.
Tinsley's "tax-and-spend liberal" is so threadbare. Tax means get the income. THEN spend it. Republicans, starting with Reagan, have been 'credit-card spenders,' recklessly running up our national debt.
Reagan tripled it, from $0.9 Trillion to $2.7 Trillion, when George the Worst took office it was $5.6T, now it is nearly $9.4T. What does Tinsley want to run the government on, gasoline fumes?
Post a Comment
<< Home
Published comments have been deemed by Heath Haussamen to be in compliance with this site’s comments policy. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Heath Haussamen or this site. If you know of a person who is abusing this site’s comments system by impersonating someone else or in other ways, please report it by clicking here.