Judge Locatelli defends lawsuit against city
Posted 6/20/2006 02:10:00 PM
Las Cruces Municipal Judges James T. Locatelli found himself defending his lawsuit against the city Monday during his interview for the vacant district court judgeship.Locatelli and the other municipal judge, Melissa Miller-Byrnes, are seeking a reimbursement of more than $100,000 they spent to defend themselves against ethical complaints filed by the city attorney’s office in 2004. They claim the city has reimbursed other judges for defense costs in the past, and the city’s failure to reimburse them is arbitrary and a violation of the separation of powers doctrine.
The dispute began in 2004, when the judges publicly blamed prosecutors for the dismissal of drunken driving and domestic violence cases and called prosecutors and police officers incompetent.
Locatelli, whose name was not recommended to Gov. Bill Richardson by Monday’s judicial nominating commission, was asked by District Judge Robert E. Robles why he did not disclose the lawsuit in the appropriate section on his application for the district judgeship.
“That’s strictly an oversight on my part,” Locatelli said.
When asked to elaborate on lawsuit, Locatelli said he and Miller-Byrnes “feel that the city does have an obligation to pay our legal fees in that matter.”
Deputy District Attorney Amy Orlando, another member of the commission, asked whether Locatelli saw a conflict in suing attorneys who appear before him in court. She said she believed there was a conflict because the attorneys are supposed to appear before Locatelli and because the city pays his salary.
Locatelli disagreed, saying the dispute has been ongoing for two years, and the city attorney’s office never asked for recusals until the judges filed the lawsuit.
“It’s not a conflict,” Locatelli said.
Locatelli defended the lawsuit and his criticism of the city attorney’s office as “proper” and “appropriate.”
“I did what I thought was right at the time,” he said. “I’ll continue to do what I think is right in the future.”
1 Comments:
Mr. Locatelli is incorrect. There is a conflict of interest, and he and Miller-Byrnes should not be hearing any cases while the lawsuit is pending. For that matter, the lawsuit is probably grounds for them to never hear cases involving the City Attoney's Office. The Supreme Court agreed with Judge Robles when he forced Susanna Martinez off the Welcome Inn Case. Maybe he should read that opinion and become educated on the law.
Post a Comment
<< Home
Published comments have been deemed by Heath Haussamen to be in compliance with this site’s comments policy. They do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Heath Haussamen or this site. If you know of a person who is abusing this site’s comments system by impersonating someone else or in other ways, please report it by clicking here.